Data Loading...
Manage & Understand Flange Face Damage Flipbook PDF
PUMPS & SYSTEMS www.pump-zone.com July 2013 51 SEALING SENSE T he purpose of surface finish is to allow a gasket to
192 Views
344 Downloads
FLIP PDF 1.18MB
SEALING SENSE
Manage & Understand Flange Face Damage What should I do about flange face damage: accept, repair or replace? By FSA member Randy Wacker
T
he purpose of surface finish is to allow a gasket to conform to and seal the flange face. “Sealing Sense” in the April 2008 Pumps & Systems discussed the importance of ensuring that the choice of gasket and surface finish work together to maintain the appropriate level of sealing stress on the gasket. This update identifies some of the typical damage that occurs to a flange face, what the effect is and discusses a way to identify the practical limits for them. Gasket Sealing A gasket’s role is to seal the space between the mating surfaces of a flange connection. This is accomplished when the bolt load compresses the gasket to a level of tightness that allows it to fill the gap between the mating faces and fill the small imperfections in the sealing surfaces. With proper flange design and gasket installation, the stress on the gasket will be sufficient to create a barrier between the pressurized side of the gasket and hold it securely in place. All the paths of leakage are effectively blocked between the gasket and flange. However, what if portions of the flange face are damaged? Will the flange leak if used or should the end user replace it? Let’s look at flange face damage and its potential effect on gasket sealing. Types of Damage Over time and for any number of reasons, damage can occur to flange faces. Each damaged area will tend to create a potential leak path that the gasket must try to seal. Some common types of flange surface damage, their characteristics and possible causes are listed below: • Scratches—This type damage is narrow and elongated with sharp, shallow bottoms. However, depending on the force that created them, they can be deep. Frequently, this type damage is created by a sharp object dragging across the flange face. These objects may include the bristles of a wire brush or a tool, such as a chisel. • Gouges—These are wide and elongated with blunt, rounded bottoms and are created by a dull object dragging across the flange face. Gouges can be caused by objects—such as a screwdriver, flange jack or chisel. PUMPS & SYSTEMS
• Pits—This damage is usually small, somewhat rounded areas of concentrated material loss created by corrosion. Often, pits occur in clusters or groups. • Dents—This type damage can be sharp or blunt nonelongated areas caused by some form of impact. Dents sometimes result from equipment collisions caused by positioning the mating flanges using cables and rigging. The most common events that create surface finish damage are indentations that occur from removing previously used gasket material from the sealing surface. Tools,
Figure 1. Flange surface damage assessment. Reprinted from ASME PCC-1-2010, by permission of ASME. All rights reserved.
www.pump-zone.com
July 2013
51
SEALING SENSE
such as chisels or screw drivers, should be avoided. A brass wire brush is preferred.
then becomes, how large is too large, or what is the limit on the number of small defects in a single area? Is the flange “fit” to be returned to service? In 2010, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) addressed this issue in its standard, Guidelines for Pressure Boundary Bolted Flange Joint Assembly, ASME PCC-1-2010. This standard provides guidance for several important flange considerations. Appendix D of the standard includes information that specifically addresses issues of flange surface condition.
Damage Impact What the damage types have in common is that they reduce the sealing tightness of the gasket against that particular (damaged) area of the flange face. If these defects are small and few, the leak tightness of the bolted connection will not be significantly impacted. If a defect is large (especially across the radial direction of the flange face) or several defects are grouped in a small area, the leakage path can exceed the ability of the gasket to block it, and leakage can occur. Whether the gasket can successfully seal these damaged areas depends on their size, depth, orientation and Table 1. Allowable defect depth versus width across a face. Reprinted from ASME PCC-1-2010, by permission number. The question of ASME. All rights reserved.
U N M AT C H A B L E E X P E R I E N C E I N P R I V AT E C O M PA N Y TRANSACTIONS
Jordan, Knauff & Company is a knowledgeable and experienced provider of a comprehensive line of investment banking services to the pump, valve and filtration industries (“Flow Control”). Our lines of business include: selling companies, raising debt and equity capital, and assistance on acquisitions. To learn more about Jordan, Knauff & Company, contact any member of our Flow Control team. Access our Flow Control research at www.jordanknauff.com/flowcontrol. G. Cook Jordan, Jr. Managing Principal [email protected] 312.254.5901
David A. Kakareka
Associate [email protected] 312.254.5907
MEMBER FINRA, SIPC
circle 140 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com
52
July 2013
circle 133 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com www.pump-zone.com
Pumps & Systems
Soft Gaskets Versus Hard Gaskets The ability of a gasket to seal a damaged area is similar to how a gasket seals against the surface finish of the flange. It depends on how conformable the gasket is to the particular area of the flange face surface. Soft gaskets are more capable of filling (and therefore sealing) a defective area than hard gaskets. For this reason, the appendix divides its guidance into two categories of gaskets: soft gaskets and hard gaskets. Each type has a different limit. For example, if a single gouge has a radial length of less than one-fourth of the gasket width, the permissible depth of the gouge is 0.050 inch for a soft gasket. The identical gouge on a hard gasket has a depth limit of only 0.030 inch. See Table 1 for additional information. For any damage type, end users must correctly categorize the type of gasket Table 2. Flange seating face flatness tolerances. Reprinted from ASME PCC-1-2010, by permission of ASME. used and match it to All rights reserved.
Appendix D includes figures and tables that provide guidelines for setting allowable limits on flange face defects. Specifically, it shows how to assess damaged portions of a flange face by taking measurements of the defective areas (see Figure 1). With these measurements, Table 1 can be accessed to determine the applicable limit for a particular type of damage. Limits are established by determining the effective length (in the radial direction) and matching it to the depth of the same defect. The respective limit will depend on the type and category of gasket being used in the bolted flange connection.
NETZSCH TORNADO® T2 Rotary Lobe Pump New Metal Lobe / Rubber Liner Design! Ground-breaking
timing / drive design Full service-in-place Replaceable liner Lowest life cycle cost Cartridge seal technology Exceptional performance Superior durability Compact and robust Low pulsation
NETZSCH Pumps North America, LLC Tel: 610-363-8010 email: [email protected] www.netzschusa.com/T2
circle 124 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com PUMPS & SYSTEMS
www.pump-zone.com
July 2013
53
SEALING SENSE
the respective table provided in the standard and noted in this article. Flange Flatness Limits The flatness of the flange also affects a gasket’s ability to seal. A lack of flange flatness can also be considered damage. This can occur because of excessive loads on the flange or as the result of errant machining of the flange surface. Soft gaskets will also tend to conform to and seal areas of poor flatness better than a hard gasket. Again, the tolerance of a lack of flatness depends on whether the gasket is soft or hard. For example, a hard gasket can seal a lack of flatness in the radial direction that is less than 0.006 inch. The limit for a soft gasket is 0.01 inch. Guidelines are also included that set limits on a lack of flatness in the circumferential direction. See Table 2 for additional information. Repair, Replace or Accept? The best policy is always to protect the flange faces from any form of damage. Plants should also establish a quality assurance program that verifies the flatness of new flanges and provides training for maintenance personnel on the
acceptable limits as provided in the guidance of ASME PCC-1-2010, Appendix D. This guidance provides the best available information for field personnel to determine whether to accept flange face damage, repair it or replace it. Author’s Note: ASME reviews and rewrites its standards every three years. PCC-1-2010 has recently undergone its review and rewrite and is currently out for ballot. Once approved via the ballot process, PCC-1-2013 is expected to be published. The new document will offer further clarification regarding the details in this article. However, minor revisions to the information offered in this “Sealing Sense” are expected. P&S Next Month: What are the energy and water usage impacts of seal support systems? We invite your suggestions for article topics as well as questions on sealing issues so we can better respond to the needs of the industry. Please direct your suggestions and questions to [email protected].
SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS
SEPTEMBER 25 – 26, 2013 CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION
Practical Solutions for Plant Management and Operations
GALVESTON, TX MOODY GARDENS HOTEL & CONVENTION CENTER
Register today at www.cpievent.com/pumps with VIP code PUMPS to qualify for Advanced Discounts!
Presented by:
SESSION HIGHLIGHT KEYNOTE SESSION: “The Shale Gale is Blowing: Plotting a Course That Avoids the Shoals and Rocks” Shale gas has revitalized the Chemical Industry in the U.S. The economic benefits have been widely described, but there is little discussion if the impacts of the great increase in ethane cracking. The shifting feedstock slate creates both challenges and opportunities for new technologies. The shoals and rocks caused by the shale gale will be described and a course described that can provide an even brighter future for the industry will be described.
David S. Bem, Ph.D. Global R&D Director The Dow Chemical Company
circle 101 on card or go to psfreeinfo.com
54
July 2013
www.pump-zone.com
Pumps & Systems