Data Loading...

Lecture 4 : Discrete Phase Model (DPM) Flipbook PDF

Lecture 4 : Discrete Phase Model (DPM)


146 Views
81 Downloads
FLIP PDF 3.02MB

DOWNLOAD FLIP

REPORT DMCA

19.0 Release

Lecture 04: Discrete Phase Model (DPM) ANSYS Fluent Multiphase Flow Modeling

1

© ANSYS, Inc.

Outline • Particulate Flow and DPM Applications • Fundamentals of Discrete Phase Modeling (DPM) • DPM Set Up in Fluent • Post Processing • Additional physics modeling features − DDPM, DEM, Erosion-MDM 2

© ANSYS, Inc.

Dilute Dispersed Flows with Particles and Droplets • Occur in many areas – Automotive – Power – Environmental – Health Care – Fire Protection – Consumer Products – Electronics cooling

3

© ANSYS, Inc.

DPM Applications

Erosion in pipe bend

Cyclone separator Particle inhalation Spray impingement 4

© ANSYS, Inc.

Discrete Phase Model (DPM) • Discrete Phase Model is a multiphase model in which the dispersed phase is tracked in a Lagrangian reference frame • Two different phases are defined in the DPM model: − A continuous phase and a particle phase

𝒅𝒅𝒑𝒑

• The discrete phase is modeled by the Lagrangian method • The continuous phase is modeled by the Eulerian method • The discrete and continuous phases are coupled via sources terms in the governing equations • Limiting assumption: − DPM is valid for volume fraction lower than ~0.1, where the particle phase is sufficiently dilute that particle-particle interactions and the effects of the particle volume fraction on the continuous phase can be neglected 5

© ANSYS, Inc.

𝑼𝑼𝒒𝒒 𝑳𝑳

Additional Simplifying Assumptions in DPM

6

© ANSYS, Inc.

What

Assumption

Particle Volume

Particle does not displace fluid (particle ≡ mass point)  Allows to neglect particle volume fraction in continuous phase solver!

Particle Shape

Particle is a sphere  Simple (center + diameter)  “Shape” needed for anything requiring the particle surface (e.g. drag forces, heat-, mass transfer)

Flow in vicinity of particle

Model flow details around particle  Influence of flow details modeled by appropriate (simple) assumptions

Number of particles

Concept of particle parcel  Track representative number of physical particles  Details later in presentation

Particle Equation of Motion • Particle position

• Particle velocity

• Particle angular velocity

7

© ANSYS, Inc.

Drag Force • Particle relaxation time

• Particle relative Reynolds number

• Drag force

8

© ANSYS, Inc.

Particle Trajectory • Other forces − Rotational forces − Thermophoretic force − Brownian force − Saffman’s lift force − Virtual mass force − User-defined forces

9

© ANSYS, Inc.

Brownian Motion Saffman Lift

Virtual Mass

Rotational Drag and Magnus Lift Rotational drag Force

• Opposes rotational motion of particle • Correlation in Fluent ‒ Dennis et al. 5

   ρf  dp  TRotational Drag =   Cω Ω ⋅ Ω 2  2 

Magnus lift force

• Particle rotation generates lift force on particle

These forces are analogous to forces arising from translational motion • Translational drag • Saffman lift WWW.GRC.NASA.GOV

10

© ANSYS, Inc.

Parcel Concept • It is very expensive to track each individual particle in a particle flow system − For a typical injection, the total particle number could be in millions! • The solution: Parcel concept: Dukowicz (1980) − Each parcel contains particles with same properties: diameter,

velocity, position, and others − The behavior of each parcel is determined by the behavior of the particles inside − The number of particles in each parcel can be a fractional number

11

© ANSYS, Inc.

Coupling Between Phases • One-way coupling: − DPM source term is updated − Particle motion is affected by the continuous phase − Continuous phase is not affected by the particle flow

Control volume

Particle Trajectory Mass, Momentum and Heat Exchange

• Two-way coupling: − Particles and continuous flow interact with each other − Particle motion is affected by the continuous phase − Continuous phase is in turn is affected by the particle flow

12

© ANSYS, Inc.

Heat and Mass Transfer • Heat transfer

𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒑𝒑 𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒑𝒑 𝒎𝒎𝒑𝒑 𝑪𝑪𝒑𝒑 = 𝒉𝒉𝑨𝑨𝒑𝒑 𝑻𝑻∞ − 𝑻𝑻𝒑𝒑 − 𝒉𝒉𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒇 + 𝑺𝑺𝒙𝒙 𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒅 𝒅𝒅𝒅𝒅 𝟏𝟏 𝟏𝟏 𝒉𝒉𝒅𝒅𝒑𝒑 𝑵𝑵𝒖𝒖 = = 𝟐𝟐. 𝟎𝟎 + 𝟎𝟎. 𝟔𝟔𝑹𝑹𝑹𝑹𝒅𝒅 𝟐𝟐 𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷𝟑𝟑 𝒌𝒌∞

• Mass transfer

– Due to evaporation/boiling/devolatilization/heterogeneous-reactions Particle Type Massless Inert Droplet Multi-component Combusting 13

© ANSYS, Inc.

Heat and Mass Transfer No drag! Used for Residence Time Distribution Studies Inert Heating and Cooling Heating, Evaporation and Boiling Multi-component evaporation Heating, Devolatilization and heterogeneous reaction

Setting Initial Conditions: Injections • You will define injection(s) which will serve as a way to seed the flow with the discrete phase

Single

• FLUENT provides 11 types of injections: − − − − − − −

14

Single Group Cone / Solid Cone (3D) Atomizers Surface File …

© ANSYS, Inc.

Surface

Group

Hollow Cone

Injection Definition • Every injection definition includes:

− Particle type (inert, droplet, or combusting particle) − Material (from data base) − Initial conditions (except when read from a file)

• Combusting particles and droplets require definition of destination species • Stochastic tracking used to model turbulent dispersion − Details on next slide

• Particle rotation can be modeled

− Additional equation solved to compute torque balance on particles including • Rotational drag forces • Magnus lift force

15

© ANSYS, Inc.

Incorporating Turbulence When particles enter a turbulent eddy, they try to follow it for the time they are crossing the eddy, depending on their Stokes number.  This effect leads to lateral dispersion which has to be considered in modeling: – Discrete random walk model (Stochastic Tracking) • Accounts for local variations in flow properties • Requires sufficient number of tries for accurate capture of turbulent dispersion – Needed to achieve a statistically meaningful sampling – Insufficient number of tries can lead to convergence problems caused by non-smooth distribution of particle sources

16

© ANSYS, Inc.

DPM Boundary Conditions • Escape – Particle leaves the flow domain.

• Trap – Particle is collected on the wall.

• Reflect – Particle bounces off the wall with user-prescribed coefficient of restitution.

17

© ANSYS, Inc.

• Wall Jet – Simulates an inviscid jet of particles impacting the wall (no significant liquid film is formed on the wall).

• Wall Film – Similar to wall jet; simulates case where significant film is formed on the wall.

Effect of Particle Rotation in Fluid • Rotating particles in coupled fluid-particle simulations − Effect of Magnus (or rotational) lift force

18

© ANSYS, Inc.

Effect of Particle Rotation on Particle-Wall Interaction • Particle rotation can significantly influence particle-wall interaction in confined geometries (pipes, channels, etc.) Particle velocity in flow direction

Without particle rotation Flow direction Particle velocity in flow direction

19

© ANSYS, Inc.

With particle rotation

Rough Wall Model for Particles • Virtual wall replaces the real wall during the impact at the point of contact with particle Virtual Wall

γw

Dp

Real Smooth Wall

• The inclination angle γw of the virtual wall is sampled from a Gaussian distribution with 0 mean and standard deviation computed as a function of − Statistical surface roughness parameters − Particle diameter 20

© ANSYS, Inc.

Effect of Wall Roughness • Gas-Solids Flow in a Horizontal Channel (1) − Gas Velocity 19.7 m/s, developed Flow − 100 micron glass particles − Large wall roughness

Inlet Dispersed flow

1)

21

© ANSYS, Inc.

0.035 m

6m

measurement plane at 5.8 m

J. Kussin and M. Sommerfeld. Experimental studies on particle behavior and turbulence modification in horizontal channel flow, Test Case Description

Gas-Solids Flow in a Horizontal Channel

Particle Velocity Magnitude (m/s)

Smooth wall Experiment Sim. Smooth wall Sim. Rough wall

measurement plane at 5.8 m

Rough wall 22

© ANSYS, Inc.

Particle Tracking Options • Steady particle tracking with steady state solution • Unsteady particle tracking with steady flow • Unsteady particle tracking with unsteady flow − Same particles and continuous phase time step size − Different particles and continuous phase time step size

23

© ANSYS, Inc.

Steady Particle Tracking with Steady Flow • DPM calculation at each Nth continuous phase iteration • Particles tracked from injection point till final state/fate • Tracking parameters − Max. number of steps and − Length scale or step length factor

• Integration time step is calculated as − If length scale is specified • ∆𝒕𝒕 =

𝑳𝑳 𝑼𝑼𝒑𝒑 +𝑼𝑼𝒄𝒄

• ∆𝒕𝒕 =

∆𝒕𝒕∗ ∅

− If step length factor is specified

24

© ANSYS, Inc.

∆t*  Estimated time required for particle to φ

traverse the current cell  Step length factor

N

Unsteady Particle Tracking with Steady Flow • Each particle is ADVANCED from its last position in the previous DPM calculation – For specified particle time step size (∆tp) • With the integration time step calculated from tracking parameters – For J number of time steps

25

© ANSYS, Inc.

N

∆tp J

Unsteady Particle Tracking with Unsteady Flow Different time step size for particles and continuous phase • Particle injection – Particle Time Step • Injecting particles in each particle time step • Integration time step is the specified particle time step – Fluid Flow Time Step • Injecting particle in each flow time step • Integration time step is the specified particle time step – Particles will always be tracked in such a way that they coincide with the flow time of the continuous flow solver • As long as the maximum number of time steps used to compute a single trajectory is sufficient 26

© ANSYS, Inc.

Solution Strategies for Steady Flows • Two strategies possible: − Closer coupling between dispersed and continuous flow: • Increase under relaxation factor for Discrete Phase • Decrease number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory calculations ( < 3 ) • Lower under relaxation factors for continuous phase.

− Decoupling of dispersed and continuous flow: • Lower under relaxation factor for Discrete Phase. • Increase number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory calculations ( > 15 )

• Smooth out particle source terms − Increase number of stochastic particle trajectories

27

© ANSYS, Inc.

DPM Source Calculations • Effect of Under-Relaxation Factor (URF) – DPM source terms calculated and updated at every particle DPM iteration/time step • # of particle iterations required for achieving full source term increases with decrease in URF • Must use URF of 1 if only one particle iteration is done in a time step – Calculations may not be stable in some cases

• Effect of update DPM Sources Every Flow Iteration – Recommended for unsteady calculations • Particle source terms calculated every DPM iteration and updated every continuous phase iteration

28

© ANSYS, Inc.

𝑬𝑬𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝑬𝑬𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 + 𝜶𝜶 𝑬𝑬𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪 − 𝑬𝑬𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐

Postprocessing: Viewing Trajectories

29

© ANSYS, Inc.

Particle Track Export • To export particle tracks for viewing in other post-processing tools such as CFDPost or Ensight, use Export > Particle History Data in the File menu − Select File Type, injection, exported particle variables • By default, only particle geometry, ID and residence time are exported − In CFD-Post, use Import from the File menu • The Insert menu can only be used to import particle tracks calculated in CFX

30

© ANSYS, Inc.

Time Statistics of Particle Variables • Ability to post process DPM variables − Mean and RMS values for transient simulations

31

© ANSYS, Inc.

Time Statistics of Particle Variables • Data sampling for Time Statistics of DPM post processing variables

32

© ANSYS, Inc.

Report Definitions for DPM • Report definitions can be used to monitor DPM variables as the solution progresses – – – – –

Injected Mass Mass in Domain Evaporated Mass Penetration Length Escaped Mass

• Can be plotted as the solution progresses and/or saved to a file

33

© ANSYS, Inc.

Additional DPM Physics Modeling Features: DDPM and DEM • As the volume fraction of particles increases, particulate flow changes from the dilute disperse flow regime to the dense disperse flow regime, and four-way coupling develops − Particle-particle interaction and particle volume displacement can no longer be neglected

• There are a number of extensions to DPM allowing these effects to be represented − Dense Discrete Phase Model (DDPM) − Discrete Element Model (DEM) − Macroscopic Particle Model (MPM)

34

© ANSYS, Inc.

Overview of Modeling Approaches • Dense Discrete Phase Model (DDPM)

DDPM-DEM: Particles colored by residence time

– Treats secondary phase solids as discrete particles dispersed in continuous fluid – Particle-Particle collisions are either modeled (KTGF based approach) or explicitly resolved (DEM based approach) – Applicable from dilute to dense particulate flows with wide particle size distribution – Compatible with species transport, homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions

• Discrete Element Method (DEM)

– Soft-sphere contact model to explicitly resolve particleparticle collisions – Efficiently handles dense and near packing limit particulate flows

35

© ANSYS, Inc.

DEM

Additional DPM Physics Modeling Features: Erosion • Erosion is a complex process that is affected by numerous factors and small changes in operational conditions can significantly affect the damage it causes • Erosion leads to a reduction in expected life time of piping systems, and is therefore vital in risk management studies • Fluent's DPM provides validated solid-particle flow modeling capabilities for a wide range of sand particle sizes and loadings – A wide array of industry-accepted erosion models, as well as the ability to include proprietary erosion models if needed – The ability to deform the pipe wall if erosion is affecting the flow pattern

36

© ANSYS, Inc.

Sand Erosion in a bend

DPM Erosion Modeling

Define Erosion Models at Walls – can use multiple models at same time • only when erosion modeling performed as a post-processing operation 37

© ANSYS, Inc.

Post-process particle tracks and erosion contours

Summary • Discrete Phase Model (DPM) allows tracking of dilute, dispersed secondary phases using the Lagrangian method − Secondary phases can be solid particles, liquid droplets, air bubbles, so long as the requirement of volume fraction < 0.10 is satisfied

• Linear motion of particles in the surrounding continuous flow field is computed using Newton's Second Law of Motion − Forces acting on particles include drag and can include various other forces as appropriate for the problem being solved

• DPM particles can exchange momentum, heat and mass (including species) with the continuous phase • Basic set up includes defining one or more injections, defining wall DPM boundary conditions and setting particle tracking options and parameters (such as interaction with continuous phase) • Particle Tracking display used for flow visualization of particles • Additional features extend particle tracking to dense-dispersed flows and erosion 38

© ANSYS, Inc.